Introduction to Remote Sensing data for Global Archaeology

Toby Wilkinson, University of Sheffield

 

This document briefly introduces some of the key sources of spatial data from remote sensing sources, and a few other data types which have been particularly useful for archaeological research, and in particular, in the construction of .

Archaeological Applications

1. Contextual mapping

Basic contextual mapping has been and will undoubtedly continue to provide the dominant usage for satellite imagery in the near-future as those archaeologists undertaking landscape surveys and regional analyses realise the ease with which satellite imagery may be used as attractive and informative 'backdrop' to distribution maps. In particular the ability to overlay previously blank white or simple vector distribution maps over textured satellite imagery could have considerable benefit for publishing and understanding of archaeological landscapes. Almost all the types mentioned in this tutorial may be used productively in this fashion, either as navigation aids in the field, or as a way to understand the context of a site in its landscape on a larger scale.

Possible datasets to use: BlueMarble, LANDSAT, Quickbird/IKONOS, SPOT, CORONA, SRTM, Astronaut's photographs, ASTER

2. Site prospection

Like aerial photography, satellite imagery may be used for visible site prospection, identification and later identification. In particular CORONA has been useful to reveal surface features in large areas of landscape from the 1960s and 70s. Other imagery might equally be of use here, though of course. With georeferenced imagery in particular, the ability to record co-ordinates and then 'ground-truth' them has become invaluable. The free availability of Quickbird through Google Earth has enabled a far-wider range of people access to high-resolution imagery. Mobile internet may also allow these images to be used in the field, in future. includes a number of examples of this sort of productive use of satellite imagery/remote sensing: eg. Mühl (2007), Philip (2007), Ur (2007), T.J. Wilkinson (2007).

Possible datasets to use: CORONA, Quickbird/IKONOS, SPOT, ASTER, LANDSAT, SRTM

3. Semi-automated site-prospection (and categorization)

The digital nature of modern satellite imagery also means that computers can be used to aid in the above process of site prospecting. While a computer can not yet replace the human interpretation combined with ground-truthing, automated processing of reflectance and topographical data can be used to significantly cut down the options, so allowing the human investigator to intervene selectively. This will undoubtedly be a growth area for archaeological remote sensing in the future, but the main problem with this kind of work is the greater technical and/or programming expertise required to perform the tasks. Few people are trained sufficiently to be able to do this easily, and guidance on the web is still in its infancy. Even where programming may not be necessary (where tools are available to process data), the cost of software can often be prohibitive. has published two related examples of this kind of application, one using SRTM to identify tells (Menze 2004), and the other developing this further to allow classification from ASTER data (Menze 2007).

Possible datasets to use: ASTER, SRTM, Quickbird/IKONOS, SPOT, LANDSAT

4. Landscape modelling and environmental reconstruction

Another growth area in archaeological applications of satellite imagery will be in the modelling of landscapes and past environments. Satellite imagery has already been used, for example, to reconstruct ancient water channels (both natural and man-made), as a means to accessing past environments (see for example Hritz & Wilkinson 2006, Mühl 2007). Beyond this, topographical data from DEMs may be used to predict trade routes, for example, and the range of environmental data from datasets such as ASTER may allow much speedier classification of environments in the present (hydrology, vegetational zones etc), or provide indications of past environments. On a qualitative level, detailed satellite imagery also provides basic environmental background to sites, allowing better understanding of their position and significance (see for example, Sherratt (2004) on Environmental Change).

Possible datasets to use: ASTER, SRTM, CORONA, LANDSAT, Quickbird/IKONOS, SPOT

 


The datasets: types of satellite imagery


Astronauts' photography


View over Lake Van, Eastern Turkey, courtesy of NASA - ESC_large_ISS015_ISS015-E-18947

Photographs taken by astronauts on the NASA Space Shuttles and International Space Stations are a rich, if now sometimes overlooked, source of imagery of the Earth from above. Most of the images are not georeferenced or orthorectified in any sense, beyond the fact that they are linked to particular locations by their metadata. While this restricts their immediate use in GIS systems, they have wide applicability in the understanding of topography, landscape and human and natural actions, and in their general visual analysis. Photographs have often been taken at significant moments/events, or of significant features, and thus provide a wealth of interesting data. Usually, they may also be reproduced for free, as long as they are correctly attributed to NASA.

Source NASA
Cost Free to download
Resolution Various
Tile footprint (swath) Various
Tile data size Various (c. 1-10Mb)
Spectrum Normal photographic/visible (Red, Green, Blue)
Georeferencing Not normally georeferenced or orthorectified
Coverage Various (global but not systematic); use NASA's search site above for coverage
Dates Various (ongoing)
Reproduction Rights Free to use, with correct NASA attribution

 

Quickbird and IKONOS


Left: Quickbird. Right: GeoEye (© GeoEye 2008)

Quickbird and IKONOS (and IKONOS' successor GeoEye1) are very similar types of satellite imagery based on commercial photographic satellites. These images are very similar to vertical aerial photographs, which are used to produce much of the highest resolution imagery on Google Earth. Of the two, Quickbird is the most commonly used in archaeology. Normally the imagery can be delivered fully georeferenced and orthorectified, and this allows fairly easy integration into existing GIS software. This has also allowed the imagery to be used as the basis for georeferencing other types of imagery (eg. Beck et al. 2007). Quickbird images are photographed in tiles, and conveniently Google Earth has a layer which shows the distribution of the footprint of these tiles, including the date and time of photography, and a link to a preview which allows you to view the cloud cover etc. There are a range of options to be decided when purchasing the imagery. For archaeological purposes, it is recommended that panchromatic data is selected. An additional layer in the Quickbird data allows increased sharpening of imagery (including other images) - often extremely useful for delineating archaeological features. The major downside of Quickbird imagery is the price - unless working in a fairly small area, or with particular research objects which require the resolution and detailed photographic texture, the cost is prohibitive. Instead, the available imagery in Google Earth may often be all that is required for visual interpretation and exploration.

Source Quickbird: DigitalGlobe
IKONOS & GeoEye1: GeoEye
Cost Expensive
Resolution Quickbird: panchromatic (black & white) 60-70cm; multispectral 2.4 and 2.8m
IKONOS: panchromatic (1-m PAN) 0.8 m; multispectral (4-m MS) 4m; pan-sharpened (1-m PS) 1m
GeoEye1: Panchromatic 0.41 m; multispectral 1.6m; pan-sharpened 0.5m
Tile footprint (swath) Quickbird: c. 16.5 km by 16.5 km
IKONOS: c. 11 km by 11 km
GeoEye1: c. 15.2 km by 15.2 km
Tile data size Quickbird, IKONOS: c. 0.5Gb
GeoEye1: c. 1Gb
Spectrum Quickbird: Panchromatic, Red, Blue, Green, Infra Red
IKONOS & GeoEye1: Visible (red, green, blue)
Georeferencing Quickbird: Normally georeferenced, can be requested as orthorectified
IKONOS & GeoEye1: Can be requested as georeferenced and orthorectified
Coverage Quickbird: Selected strips of world surface (use Google Earth to identify coverage)
IKONOS & GeoEye1: Selected strips of world surface(use GeoEye’s website for coverage)
Dates Quickbird: 2001 - ongoing
IKONOS: 1999 - ongoing
GeoEye1: 2008 - ongoing
Reproduction Rights Quickbird: Licence normally allows publication of resultant imagery, but not redistribution of data. Check details. Educational licence available.
IKONOS & GeoEye1:Licence normally allows publication of resultant imagery, but not redistribution of data. Check details.
More InformationQuickbird: http://www.tuarc.trentu.ca/~aspweb/en/downloads.shtml
IKONOS & GeoEye1:http://www.geoeye.com/CorpSite/products/imagery-sources/Comparison.aspx

 

Corona and Declassified satellite photography

Declassified spy satellite data, particularly imagery from the CORONA satellite series, has proven particularly useful to archaeologists in many regions of the world. Its most extensive utilisation has been in the recording of features in the landscape of the Near East which have since been obliterated by the effects of intensive modern agriculture. Precisely because the imagery is dated (mostly between the 1960s and 70s), CORONA imagery thus provides the archaeologist with a temporal aspect to witness landscape transformations, and see things which have since been destroyed. The data is not normally georeferenced on delivery from USGS, requiring georeferencing. It is however, inexpensive to procure per square kilometre. For this reason, the CAMEL programme based at the Oriental Institute in Chicago has begun to collect and georeference CORONA imagery of the Middle East in its database and claim to be able to make this available for usage to archaeological researchers. The full coverage of the declassified imagery is not globally comprehensive, but rather reflects the interests of Cold War American military concerns. The actual ground resolution of scenes is variable for two reasons: first because of the different satellites and photographic equipment used on them, and secondly because of the distortion effects at the extremes of the images. Care should be taken to select 'high resolution' scenes wherever possible. Compared to modern colour imagery, CORONA is probably most effective in areas, which have undergone substantial change in the last 50 years, and also in regions of relatively flat terrain where archaeological features may be more easily discernible.

Source USGS
Cost Inexpensive
Resolution Various, may also vary within same image due to distortion
Tile footprint (swath) Various, dependent on particular image
Tile data size Tile data size Various, 40Mb to 1Gb per file (can be as much as 8Gb/image)
Spectrum Declassified 1 black & white
Declassified 2 some colour, black & white
Georeferencing Not normally georeferenced on delivery but see Beck et al. (2007)
Coverage Tendency to cover areas of interest to US military during Cold War, including especially border regions of former USSR. Check USGS EarthExplorer website for coverage
Dates Declassified Group 1 KH1-6, 1959 to 1972
Declassified Group 2 KH7&9, 1963 to 1980
Reproduction Rights Licence normally allows publication of resultant imagery, but not redistribution of data. Check details.
More InformationSee Ur (2003)
Beck et al. (2007)
http://www.archatlas.org/workshop/Ur07.php
http://edc.usgs.gov/products/satellite/declass1.html
http://edc.usgs.gov/products/satellite/declass2.html

 

SPOT


Angkor, SPOT 5, 2003

SPOT is a French-based series of satellites, which have a variety of sensors and purposes. The term 'SPOT' may be used for a variety of different types of imagery with quite different qualities, including SPOTView, SPOTMaps and SPOTDEM. Most archaeologists will be interested in 'SPOTView Ortho' which provides pre-processed imagery, georeferenced and orthorectified depending on specifications, suitable for direct import into a GIS or image-processing program. SPOT imagery usages are similar to Quickbird, IKONOS, or Corona. The imagery post-dates the world-wide expansion of intensive agriculture (mid-1980s), so gives a less historical picture than CORONA, but a slightly longer one than Quickbird or IKONOS.

Source SPOT Image
Cost Expensive: see price list (http://www.spotimage.fr/web/en/336-price-lists.php)
Resolution Various dependent on SPOT-x version:
SPOT 1,2,3 - Panchromatic 10m, Multispectral 20m
SPOT 4,5 - 2.5m, 5m Panchromatic 10m
Tile footprint (swath) 60 x 60km
Tile data size DIMAP format (based on GeoTIFF)
Spectrum Visible, Infrared
Georeferencing Depends on particular product:
SPOTScene has limited adjustment, only Level 2A georectified but not tied to ground points
SPOTView Ortho L2B & 3 geo-referenced and orthorectified
SPOTMap fully ortho- & geo- rectified but covers limited area
Coverage Check SpotImage website for coverage
Dates Earliest 1986 onwards; SPOT 5, 2002-
Reproduction Rights Check.
More Informationhttp://www.geoimage.com.au/geoweb/spot/spot_overview.htm

 

SRTM terrain model


Cilicia, SRTM elevations as displayed by GlobalMapper

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (STRM) was a NASA programme designed to measure the elevation of the entire Earth's land surface based on a triangulation of bouncing radar signals sent from the Space Shuttle. Its immediate benefit has been a freely available, world wide Digital Elevation Model (DEM) which has applications in large scale mapping. It is used by both Google Earth and NASA's WorldWind, for example, to enable the 'three-dimensional' features of both programs. The full SRTM resolution is around 30m (only for North America) and 90m (rest of world). It is excellent for small regional terrain mapping, and with interpolation, can provide good visuals for local regions. In areas of particularly high relief, and a few 'watery' locations, the SRTM sensors could not get a reliable reading, and these areas appear blank on the NASA source data (SRTM2 & 3). SRTM data has a single spectral dimension, namely elevation and requires an appropriate GIS utility to view or convert. In archaeology, as well as providing a basis for three-dimensional modelling of landscapes for mapping of survey distributions, SRTM data has also been used in the identification of tell sites (both manually and semi-automatically), whose shape have a particularly recognisable signature in the wide flat plains of the Near East (see Sherratt 2006, Menze, Ur & Sherratt 2006).

Source NASA
CGIAR CSI (uses KML for Google Earth to aid selection)
Cost Free to download
Resolution North America 30m
Rest of World (downgraded to) 90m
Tile footprint (swath) c. 110km N x 90km E
Tile data size 0.2-1.9Mb compressed .hgt.zip format
Spectrum DEM - Elevation only
Georeferencing Georeferenced
Coverage Global, but note some areas of high relief are blank in the basic downloaded data from NASA. In-filled or interpolated data is available from other suppliers.
Dates 2000
Reproduction Rights Free to deploy, with appropriate attribution
More InformationSee Sherratt (2006)
Hritz & Wilkinson (2006)

 

ASTER wide-spectrum reflectivity


NASA ASTER image of Nazca lines in S. America

ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) is a sensor used to map land surface temperature, reflectance and elevation. With three different sensors onboard, covering 14 different bands, it has the advantage of offering considerable variables to assess the ground surface through temperature/reflectance, potentially modelling geology, hydrology and climate. For this reason it is particularly suitable to developing predictive modelling for site location, using more advanced image processing and filtering (see Menze 2007). The raw data also includes an additional visual band taken at a different angle, allowing a single tile of ASTER to form a stereoscopic pair, thus also enabling the creation of a Digital Elevation Model with suitable software. ASTER comes in several different versions, and it can often be difficult to work out exactly which is useful. Level 1A is a raw format, system corrected but receiving minimal processing. Level 1B is radiometrically and geometrically corrected based on orbit data, but not on ground control points. This means it is broadly geographically correct and can be imported into general GIS viewers for further processing or viewing, but there is often an offset accuracy error which needs correcting before the imagery can be used widely. The other 'levels' (2,3,4) are derived images designed to highlight surface reflectance.

Source NASA
http://edcimswww.cr.usgs.gov/pub/imswelcome/
http://www.gds.aster.ersdac.or.jp/gds_www2002/index_e.html
http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/NewReq.asp
http://edcimswww.cr.usgs.gov/pub/imswelcome/
Cost Various. Inexpensive.
Some data can be obtained free (eg. Level 1A&B for USA)
Resolution VNIR (visual) 15m
SWIR (infrared) 30m; TIR (thermal infrared) 90m
Tile footprint (swath) 60km (horizontal)
Tile data size Various
Spectrum Visual, Shortwave Infrared, Thermal Infrared
Georeferencing Level 1B has non-ground point based georeferencing and often requires minor correction (eg. with ENVI) , c. +/-20m
Coverage Global
Dates 1999 -
Reproduction Rights Check
More Informationhttp://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/
http://www.archatlas.org/workshop/Menze07.php
http://www.satimagingcorp.com/satellite-sensors/aster.html
http://www.terrainmap.com/rm24.html#ASTERL1A

 

LANDSAT


False colour LANDSAT 7 from north west Turkey

LANDSAT was one of the first forms of remote sensing data to be used extensively in archaeological mapping and landscape reconstruction. Unlike much of the photographic data which is from a particular point in time, LANDSAT is a synthetic mosaic of the Earth, taken over a long period of time to provide global coverage of the reflective quality of the land surface: it thus has zero cloud cover. LANDSAT 7 has 7 bands or spectral interest. The resultant images can be confusing as they are false colour composites (the colours produced are composites of the spectral data measured, but they are not the same as the 'photographic' spectrum). For this reason, 'natural' colour variants which have a more natural photographic appearance are widely available and in usage in a variety of contexts. The base Google Earth layers are 'TruEarth' based on LANDSAT 7, which has good spatial contrast on the regional level. LANDSAT 7's scale (15m) is good for pan-regional analysis as it easily shows the shape of the human intervention on the natural environment (roads, cities, agricultural field systems, natural environments, landscape zoning, water etc), but it is not detailed enough to be able to pick out individual archaeological features.

Source NASA / USGS / other commercial suppliers
https://zulu.ssc.nasa.gov/mrsid/
http://edcsns17.cr.usgs.gov/EarthExplorer/
http://www.resmap.com/
http://www.earthsat.com/HTML/naturalvue/
http://www.terracolor.net/
Cost Free to download. (More processed versions of LANDSAT such as simulated natural colour may cost to licence and reproduce).
Resolution LANDSAT 1-3 multispectral 80m
LANDSAT 5 (TM) 30m
LANDSAT 7 (ETM) 15m to 60m multispectral
Tile footprint (swath) Varies depending on tile, but most c. 550km N x 700km E
Tile data size LANDSAT 7 - 150-250Mb, compressed MrSID format
Spectrum LANDSAT 7 - 7 spectral bands (most commonly viewed is '742')
'Natural' colour versions are available
Georeferencing Georeferenced and orthorectified
(ArcMap requires the UTM spatial reference to be set)
Coverage Global
Dates LANDSAT 1-3: 1972-2002
LANDSAT 5: 1997
LANDSAT 7: 2002
Reproduction Rights Free to reproduce with NASA attribution. 'True'/'Natural' colour variants may cost to licence
More Informationhttp://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/
http://landsat.usgs.gov/index.php

 

BlueMarble

BlueMarble is a composite image (based on MODIS data from 2004) of the entire globe's surface. Though limited in its use for site prospection (the resolution of 500m is far too low for most purposes), it is an extremely clear and attractive basemap for explaining site context in a landscape, or regional relationships. It has been used extensively on for this purpose. The 'Next Generation' image set, which shows snow cover changes across the year, might also be used to think through ideas about seasonality and changing annual landscapes. BlueMarble is projected in a georeferenced way when downloaded, but ArcMap needs the projection metadata to be added before it can actually be recognised as such. This can be easily done manually with a tool like GlobalMapper, to provide the WGS84 latitude/longitude values for each corner (-180, 90, 180, -90), or slightly more complicatedly in ArcMap itself.

Source NASA: http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_set.php?categoryID=2355
Cost
Resolution 500m, 2km, 8km
Tile footprint (swath) Global (or divided into 8 segments)
Tile data size eg. 24Mb per tile as JPEG
Spectrum Visible
Georeferencing Georeferenced, but may need to have spatial reference defined for use in ArcMap etc.
Coverage Global
Dates Composite of 2004; 12-monthly versions
Reproduction Rights Free to reproduce with NASA attribution

 

For further information:

References



Sherratt 2006
Andrew Sherratt (2006), 'Tellspotting', ArchAtlas, 2008, Edition 3, http://www.archatlas.dept.shef.ac.uk/../Tellspotting/TellsMain.php. Accessed: 12 April 2008

Sherratt 2004
Andrew Sherratt (2004), 'Environmental Change: the evolution of Mesopotamia', ArchAtlas, January 2008, Edition 3, http://www.archatlas.dept.shef.ac.uk/../EnvironmentalChange/EnvironmentalChange.php. Accessed: 12 April 2008

Ur 2007
Jason Ur (2007), 'Agricultural and Pastoral Landscapes in the Near East: Case Studies using CORONA Satellite Photography ', ArchAtlas, January 2008, Edition 3, http://www.archatlas.dept.shef.ac.uk/../workshop/Ur07.php. Accessed: 18 September 2008

Menze et al. 2006
Menze, B.H., J.A. Ur and Sherratt A.G 2006, 'Detection of Ancient Settlement Mounds: Archaeological Survey Based on the SRTM Terrain Model', Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72:321-7.

Philip et al. 2002
Philip, G., D. Dononghue, A. Beck, and N. Galiatsatos 2002, 'CORONA Satellite Photography: An Archaeological Application from the Middle East', Antiquity, 76:109-18.

Beck et al. 2007
Beck, A., G. Philip, M. Abdulkarim and D. Donoghue 2007, 'Evaluation of Corona and Ikonos high resolution satellite imagery for archaeological prospection in western Syria', Antiquity, 81:161-175.

Beck 2006
Beck, A., G. Philip, M. Abdulkarim and D. Donoghue, 'Google Earth and World Wind: remote sensing for the masses?', Antiquity Project Gallery, 80, . http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/beck/index.html.

 



How to cite this page: Toby Wilkinson (2009), 'Introduction to Remote Sensing data for Global Archaeology', ArchAtlas, Version 4.1, http://www.archatlas.org/occpaper/sat-usage.php, Accessed: 20 October 2014